Welcome To Author Jane Lim's Homepage
By Jane Lim | May 15, 2025
Why would you want to lose your intellectual properties (IP) to foreign countries where your inventions are manufactured? Why would you want to pay a 145% import tax on your products which are shipped back to and purchased by your country? Why would you give your blueprint to your neighbor to build your house and impose a construction sanction on your house which will be delivered to your land and paid by you?
US tariffs (sanctions) should be used against products that were not made by American companies. However, nearly all products shipped from China to the US have been invented or designed by American companies for American consumers.
It is unwise for traders to begin with globalism (foreign country of origin) and end up with Nazism (tariff) since the combination of the risk of IP thefts (globalism) and tariffs (Nazism) is greater than the risk of tariffs (Nazism) alone.
Nationalism (Nazism) does not need to be punished if it does not trigger wars. Manufacturing properties are not less important than intellectual properties. It is safer to maintain domestic manufacturing facilities than to build international manufacturing facilities in foreign countries. In 2022, Hyundai Motor had to sell its factory for $10 (KRW14,000) to Russia losing $219 million in Russia. There is no guarantee that this will never happen in the US or China. In 2025, 28 American companies received sanctions from the Chinese government.
You would not have lost your intellectual and manufacturing properties both if you had not practiced globalism in the first place. Or, you needed not to shut down your factories in foreign countries if your country did not practice Nazism by imposing tariffs on your products shipped back to your country.
A patent of a country should be automatically and immediately effective in all countries and protected by an international law in all countries because all countries are involved with trading. All domestic patents must be registered automatically with IPO without international applications and effective in all countries without foreign applications. Tariffs are not more effective than this new treaty because this new treaty does not cause inflation, recession or unemployment and certainly protects your domestic and international products shipped from foreign countries to the world.
To slow down the recession, the Chinese government has started offering incentives to consumers after the US tariffs were imposed on imported products from China. China is the first country that partly adopted Revolutionary Producer-Customer Relationship (RPCR) which I introduced in my book. In China, not producers but the Chinese government provided incentives for customers because the economy of China is fine-tuned by the Communist party.
In order to prevent the recession, the US government will have to adopt the full mode of RPCR before it is too late during Trump’s tariff war. RPCR keeps the economy under control meaning that “recession and inflation,” which is the symptom of stagflation, can be easily controlled not by the profits of bankers (high interest rates) which are your debts but by the profits of producers and customers (RPCR), which comprise your GDPs.
China and the US will likely survive the tariff war if they adopt the full mode of RPCR during the tariff war. The full mode of RPCR eliminates the need of tariffs because tariffs become powerless when RPCR is applied to all imported and exported products across the world, which is the most ideal breakthrough for all parties involved. RPCR does not hurt the sales of domestic products or foreign products. It rather promotes the sales of both. Countries have no reasons to build barriers against each other in this new economic system, RPCR.
If non-profit organizations or companies are government-funded, the benefits or the profits must be shared with customers (taxpayers) in RPCR.
Under RPCR, the fate of producers and consumers becomes one. Under RPCR, if customers (employees) become rich, producers (employers) become rich and vice versa. Producers realize that they cannot survive without customers. Thus, customers become business partners in RPCR. Customers are not the subjects to chase and enslave using credit cards (Proverbs 22:7).
The philosophy of RPCR is similar to the spirit of trading. Instead of killing producers to take over their products, traders learned how to negotiate for the mutual benefits and agreed to exchange what they can offer at their best and expect the same thing in return. In 2025, Warren Buffett said, “We should do what we do best and they should do what they do best.” This is the spirit of RPCR which I introduced in my book in 2022.
Tariffs are not the best tool to secure manufacturing capacities because the disadvantages are greater than the advantages. Will you bankrupt your international companies and lay off your employees in order to build your domestic factories in your country later? Trump administration must begin RPCR like China partly adopted it.
How can RPCR force monopoly business owners such as Amazon or Microsoft to provide stimulus checks (incentives) for consumers even if they are foreigners?
How does RPCR abolish tariffs across the world?
How can RPCR force the best sellers to offer stimulus checks (incentives for customers) to domestic customers even if the best sellers are foreigners?
How does RPCR help us begin fair games and global citizenships?
What are the differences between RPCR incentives and dividends from stock investments?
Why is RPCR a breakthrough for the countries that benefit bankers not traders?
How does RPCR prevent billionaires from evading taxes?
How can RPCR eliminate the need of the US Treasury bonds which are the US debts?
Find out the answers in my book, Directors Of COVID-19 Pandemic & WW3: New Economic Systems To Prevent Biowar, Recession And Paradoxical Vaccination.